SAT语法题:修改句子In just a couple of years,low-carbohydrate diets have accomplished what the government has failed to do in decades of trying:convince the public that refined grains are bad and whole grains are good.这个句子是已经改
来源:学生作业帮助网 编辑:作业帮 时间:2024/07/06 12:11:33
![SAT语法题:修改句子In just a couple of years,low-carbohydrate diets have accomplished what the government has failed to do in decades of trying:convince the public that refined grains are bad and whole grains are good.这个句子是已经改](/uploads/image/z/7101670-22-0.jpg?t=SAT%E8%AF%AD%E6%B3%95%E9%A2%98%EF%BC%9A%E4%BF%AE%E6%94%B9%E5%8F%A5%E5%AD%90In+just+a+couple+of+years%2Clow-carbohydrate+diets+have+accomplished+what+the+government+has+failed+to+do+in+decades+of+trying%3Aconvince+the+public+that+refined+grains+are+bad+and+whole+grains+are+good.%E8%BF%99%E4%B8%AA%E5%8F%A5%E5%AD%90%E6%98%AF%E5%B7%B2%E7%BB%8F%E6%94%B9)
SAT语法题:修改句子In just a couple of years,low-carbohydrate diets have accomplished what the government has failed to do in decades of trying:convince the public that refined grains are bad and whole grains are good.这个句子是已经改
SAT语法题:修改句子
In just a couple of years,low-carbohydrate diets have accomplished what the government has failed to do in decades of trying:convince the public that refined grains are bad and whole grains are good.
这个句子是已经改对了的,还有一个选项是convince变成convincing其他都不变,为什么convincing不对呢?“分号”不是既可以做连词又可以不是连词吗?
SAT语法题:修改句子In just a couple of years,low-carbohydrate diets have accomplished what the government has failed to do in decades of trying:convince the public that refined grains are bad and whole grains are good.这个句子是已经改
诶,你这里哪里有分号,看了半天,你打的是冒号呀?冒号是对后面的事物进行解释.但是我觉得你是不是把分号打错了,我觉得这里是“;”,吧.相当于“and”