难道这里过去分词之后的名词只做补语,不做过去分词的宾语?a)The man named Tom entered the room.b)Appointed monitor,he was very glad.请问:难道这里过去分词NAMED和APPOINTED之后的名词TOM,MONITOR在句中都只做
来源:学生作业帮助网 编辑:作业帮 时间:2024/07/06 20:24:47
![难道这里过去分词之后的名词只做补语,不做过去分词的宾语?a)The man named Tom entered the room.b)Appointed monitor,he was very glad.请问:难道这里过去分词NAMED和APPOINTED之后的名词TOM,MONITOR在句中都只做](/uploads/image/z/7295896-64-6.jpg?t=%E9%9A%BE%E9%81%93%E8%BF%99%E9%87%8C%E8%BF%87%E5%8E%BB%E5%88%86%E8%AF%8D%E4%B9%8B%E5%90%8E%E7%9A%84%E5%90%8D%E8%AF%8D%E5%8F%AA%E5%81%9A%E8%A1%A5%E8%AF%AD%2C%E4%B8%8D%E5%81%9A%E8%BF%87%E5%8E%BB%E5%88%86%E8%AF%8D%E7%9A%84%E5%AE%BE%E8%AF%AD%3Fa%29The+man+named+Tom+entered+the+room.b%29Appointed+monitor%2Che+was+very+glad.%E8%AF%B7%E9%97%AE%EF%BC%9A%E9%9A%BE%E9%81%93%E8%BF%99%E9%87%8C%E8%BF%87%E5%8E%BB%E5%88%86%E8%AF%8DNAMED%E5%92%8CAPPOINTED%E4%B9%8B%E5%90%8E%E7%9A%84%E5%90%8D%E8%AF%8DTOM%2CMONITOR%E5%9C%A8%E5%8F%A5%E4%B8%AD%E9%83%BD%E5%8F%AA%E5%81%9A)
难道这里过去分词之后的名词只做补语,不做过去分词的宾语?a)The man named Tom entered the room.b)Appointed monitor,he was very glad.请问:难道这里过去分词NAMED和APPOINTED之后的名词TOM,MONITOR在句中都只做
难道这里过去分词之后的名词只做补语,不做过去分词的宾语?
a)The man named Tom entered the room.
b)Appointed monitor,he was very glad.
请问:
难道这里过去分词NAMED和APPOINTED之后的名词TOM,MONITOR在句中都只做补语,都不做其前面的过去分词的宾语?
难道这里过去分词之后的名词只做补语,不做过去分词的宾语?a)The man named Tom entered the room.b)Appointed monitor,he was very glad.请问:难道这里过去分词NAMED和APPOINTED之后的名词TOM,MONITOR在句中都只做
收到两份追问,问题相同,回答也一样.
今天外出,现在回复,请不要嫌晚.
先别急,这样,我们先从语态的性质说一下.
1) 上面两个动词 name 与 appointed 都具备需要带宾语与宾语补足语,但只是在主动语态的情况下才能够有宾语与宾语补足语.即是主语 We name the man Tom.,这里 Tom 是宾语补足语;We appoint him the monitor.,这里的 Monitor 是宾语补足语.
2) 由于语态的变化,原来的宾语成现在主语, The man is named Tom.,这是的 Tom 由于被补足对象成了主语,所以 Tom 此时成了主语补足语.He is appointed monitor.,与上面同解,Monitor 成了主语补足语了.
这一语法现象,初中的英语老师应当在讲到被动语态时,必须要向学生讲清楚这一语态变化引起的句子成分变化.
不知上面的解答能否满足你的要求,可以追问
named Tom作后置定语,Appointed monitor作句子补语
你说的应该对 其实我也无法核实 去问老师吧你